Landmark US Supreme Court Decisions

Created: Saturday, February 23, 2008 | Total records: 219
Select SCOTUS cases.
CURRENT PAGE: 2 of 9.
Records per page: 25.

Add this database
to your website

Order by: Per Page:
Go to page #

Download this database as: Excel Spreadsheet (XLS file) | CSV file
Database style: Table view | List view
FIRST | < PREVIOUS | RECORDS | NEXT > | LAST

idPlaintiffvDefendantVol.SeriesPageAltern.YearSynopsis
26Willsonv.Black Bird Creek Marsh Co.27U.S.2452 Pe.1829Denied a challenge of a state law authorizing the building of a dam across a navigable creek, claiming the law was in conflict with the federal power to regulate interstate commerce, saying that the state act could not be "considered as repugnant to the [federal] power to regulate commerce in its dormant state[.]" (Origin of "dormant commerce clause" doctrine.)
27Cherokee Nationv.Georgia30U.S.11831Upheld rights of Cherokees to remain in Georgia and retain their lands, and struck down state actions intended to deprive them of such lands, but Pres. Jackson refused to comply with court order, and allowed Cherokees to be driven out.
28U.S.v.Wilson32U.S.1507 Pe.1833Defined legal nature of a pardon as a grant of relief from enforcement of a court sentence.
29Barronv.Baltimore32U.S.2431833Federal courts do not have jurisdiction in cases in which a citizen sues his state for violation of any of the Bill of Rights.
30U.S.v.Clarke33U.S.4368 Pe.1834The United States is "not suable of common right, the party who institutes such suit must bring his case within the authority of some act of Congress." Established doctrine of sovereign immunity for federal government.
31U.S.v.Bailey34U.S.2389 Pe.1835Upheld prosecution for violation of a regulation rather than the act itself.
32Rhode Islandv.Massachusetts37U.S.65712 Pe.1838“[T]he distribution and appropriate exercise of the judicial power must ... be made by laws passed by Congress. ..."
33Gamesv.Dunn39U.S.32214 Pe.1840When judge and jury disagree on a question of law, the decision of the judge prevails. Previously, the decision of the jury prevailed. Enabled judge to decide cases without a jury.
34Grovesv.Slaughter40U.S.44915 Pe.1841The power to regulate commerce did not imply the power to prohibit it.
35Louisville, C. & C.R. Co.v.Letson43U.S.4972 Ho.1844“[A] corporation created by and doing business in a particular State, is to be deemed to all intents and purposes as a person, although an artificial person, an inhabitant of the same State, for the purposes of its incorporation, capable of being treated as a citizen of that State, as much as a natural person."
36Lutherv.Borden48U.S.17 Ho.1849Found that the Rhode Island legislature had been authorized to resort to the rights and usages of war in combating insurrection in that State, and that state declarations of martial law were conclusive and therefore not subject to judicial review, but properly within the discretion of Congress and the President. But the "insurrection", Dorrs Rebellion, was an attempt to compel compliance with state constitution by noncompliant state government, after exhausting lesser remedies.
37Marshallv.Baltimore & Ohio R. Co.57U.S.31416 Ho.1854Created a conclusive presumption that all of the stockholders of a corporation are citizens of the State of incorporation, for purposes of representing them as a single corporate person.
38Murrays Lesseev.Hoboken Land & Improvement Co.59U.S.27218 Ho.1856Sustained tax assessment and collection as executive acts which may be decided in Article I court.
39Ex parteSecombe60U.S.919 Ho.1857The power of the federal courts to admit and disbar attorneys rests on the common law from which it was originally derived.
40Dred Scottv.Sandford60U.S.39319 Ho.1857Held rights protected by Constitution apply to citizens rather than persons, and that blacks and their descendants were not embraced within the term "citizen" as used in the Constitution.
41Kentuckyv.Dennison65U.S.6624 Ho.1861In all cases where original jurisdiction is given by the Constitution, the Supreme Court has authority "to exercise it without further act of Congress to regulate its powers or confer jurisdiction..."
42The Prize Cases67U.S.6352 Bl.1863Sustained the blockade of the Southern ports instituted by Lincoln in 1861, without a declaration of war, at a time when Congress was not in session, affirming a state of war could exist without formal declaration by Congress, imposed by the enemy, and requiring an immediate response without first getting authority from Congress in a declaration of war.
43Ex parteVallandigham68U.S.2431 Wa.1864Held only Congress can authorize the substitution of military tribunals for civil tribunals for the trial of offenses; and Congress can do so only in wartime, but while war was still flagrant it had no power to review the proceedings of a military commission ordered by a general officer of the Army.
44Gilmanv.Philadelphia70U.S.7133 Wa.1866Congress has jurisdiction under commerce clause over "all the navigable waters of the United States which are accessible from a State other than those in which they lie" and that this "includes the power to keep them open and free from any obstruction to their navigation, interposed by the States or otherwise; to remove such obstructions when they exist; and to provide, by such sanctions as they may deem proper, against the occurrence of the evil and for the punishment of offenders."
45Ex parteMilligan71U.S.24 Wa.1866Trial by a military commission of a civilian charged with disloyalty in a part of the country remote from the theater of military operations was held invalid. Civil court review of court-martial decisions is possible through habeas corpus jurisdiction. "The Constitution of the United States is a law for rulers and people, equally in war and in peace, and covers with the shield of its protection all classes of men, at all times, and under all circumstances." Held the Writ is not suspended but only the privilege, so that the Writ would issue and the issuing court on its return would determine whether the person applying can proceed.
46CummingsMissouri71U.S.2774 Wa.1867Cummings v. Missouri, 4 Wall. (71 U.S.) 277, 323 (1867) The phrase "bill of attainder", as used in Art. I Sec. 9 and 10 applies to bills of pains and penalties as well as to the traditional bills of attainder imposing capital penalties.
47Ex parteGarland71U.S.3334 Wa.1867Effect of pardon is to prevent or remove all penalties and disabilities that result, or might result, from a conviction and sentence, and in this case, relieved person from having to declare guilt for a pardoned offense in an oath required for the practice of law.
48Mississippiv.Johnson71U.S.4754 Wa.1867President declared beyond the reach of judicial direction, either affirmative or restraining, in the exercise of his powers, whether constitutional or statutory, political or otherwise, save perhaps for what must be a small class of powers that are purely ministerial.
49DeGrootv.U.S.72U.S.4195 Wa.1867Supreme Court has appellate jurisdiction over Article I courts.
50Ex parteMcCardle74U.S.5061868Congress may remove jurisdiction from the Supreme Court.

CURRENT PAGE: 2 of 9. Records per page: 25.
FIRST | < PREVIOUS | RECORDS | NEXT > | LAST